Dallas

Adult Movie Theatres in Dallas

Texas · last checked 24 September 2026

Dallas has five adult arcades trading, one of them with a theatre attached, and they are all run by the same family of businesses along Mockingbird, Northwest Highway, Shiloh Road and Harry Hines. The city licenses each one and publishes the list, which makes Dallas the easiest city in America to count and the hardest to be confident about.

What is open right now

Alternatives of New Fine Arts

Theatre

1720 West Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, TX 75235

Has
Arcade and theatre
Hours
6am to 2am daily
Phone
(214) 638-0765

The only venue in the group with an actual theatre rather than only booths, and the reason Dallas answers the question at all. It shares a building with the arcade below, in a separate unit.

Last checked 24 September 2026 · On the operator's current location list

New Fine Arts, Mockingbird

Booth arcade

1720 West Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, TX 75235

Hours
6am to 2am daily
Phone
(214) 638-0765

The best-documented of the five and the one with recent reviews behind it. The Dallas Observer has handed it Best Adult Arcade and, more recently, Best Sex Shop and Best Novelty Store, which is a sentence that would not make sense in most of the cities on this site.

Last checked 24 September 2026 · Listing refreshed August 2026, 27 reviews

New Fine Arts, Shiloh Road

Booth arcade

12045 Shiloh Road, Dallas, TX 75228

Hours
6am to 2am daily
Phone
(214) 327-0551

Last checked 24 September 2026 · Operator's list, address corroborated by the city register

New Fine Arts, Northwest Highway

Booth arcade

1966 West Northwest Highway, Dallas, TX 75220

Hours
6am to 2am daily
Phone
(972) 869-1098

Last checked 24 September 2026 · Operator's list, address corroborated by the city register

Paris Adult

Booth arcade

11118 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75229

Hours
6am to 2am daily
Phone
(972) 263-0774

Last checked 24 September 2026 · Operator's list, address corroborated by the city register

All five are one operation. Directories present them as five separate choices in five parts of town, and in a sense they are, but if one disappoints you the others will not be different.

A licence is not an open door

Dallas keeps a register of licensed sexually oriented businesses and publishes it. The January 2022 edition lists nine under the heading adult bookstore, arcade, theater, including two called Xposed Adult Theater and Lido Adult Theater. A licence in a 2022 memo is not evidence that a door opens in 2026, so neither is listed above.

What a licence means

Somebody paid a fee and satisfied the city. It says nothing about whether the door opens.

What the city writes instead

ACTIVE LICENSE / CLOSED DOWN
HOLDING LICENSE NOT OPERATING
NOT OPERATING

Categories from the City of Dallas register of sexually oriented businesses, January 2022. Directories copy the licence and skip the second column.

The city knows the difference perfectly well. Its own register has a column for what a business is licensed as and another for what it is actually doing, and that second column contains entries reading active licence and closed down, holding licence not operating, and simply not operating.

That is the whole problem with this subject in one municipal spreadsheet. Almost every guide to adult venues is, in effect, a copy of somebody’s licence list. Dallas is unusual only in being honest about the gap.

Why Dallas licenses them at all

In the 1980s Dallas adopted a comprehensive ordinance covering sexually oriented businesses: adult arcades, bookstores, video stores, cabarets, motels and theatres, plus escort agencies, nude model studios and sexual encounter centres. Every one of them needed a licence, and certain people were barred from holding one.

The operators sued, and on 8 January 1990 the Supreme Court decided FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas. Six justices agreed that the licensing scheme was a prior restraint without adequate procedural safeguards: nothing in it guaranteed a licence would be granted or refused promptly, or that a refusal could be taken to a court quickly. Under the standard set in Freedman v. Maryland in 1965, that made the scheme unconstitutional on its face.

The city did not lose everything. The Court upheld pulling motels that rent rooms for under ten hours into the scheme, accepting that Dallas had a factual basis for it.

Set beside Los Angeles, the pair explains most of how American cities handle this now. Dallas lost in 1990 on how it licensed; Los Angeles won in 2002 on how far apart it kept them. Cities learned to do the second thing carefully and the first thing with a clock attached.

Sources

Something here wrong or out of date? Tell us and we will check it.

All cities